From 01765d24d26ff734c5f39f51b9ebbf669050f423 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Shikhar Bhushan <shikhar@schmizz.net>
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2011 16:45:12 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] AbstractChannel - no reason for channel request response
 events to share the same underlying lock object. #27

---
 .../net/schmizz/sshj/connection/channel/AbstractChannel.java   | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/src/main/java/net/schmizz/sshj/connection/channel/AbstractChannel.java b/src/main/java/net/schmizz/sshj/connection/channel/AbstractChannel.java
index 584c2ba3..cbdefdd2 100644
--- a/src/main/java/net/schmizz/sshj/connection/channel/AbstractChannel.java
+++ b/src/main/java/net/schmizz/sshj/connection/channel/AbstractChannel.java
@@ -377,7 +377,8 @@ public abstract class AbstractChannel
 
         Event<ConnectionException> responseEvent = null;
         if (wantReply) {
-            responseEvent = new Event<ConnectionException>("chan#" + id + " / " + "chanreq for " + reqType, ConnectionException.chainer, lock);
+            responseEvent = new Event<ConnectionException>("chan#" + id + " / " + "chanreq for " + reqType,
+                                                           ConnectionException.chainer);
             chanReqResponseEvents.add(responseEvent);
         }
         return responseEvent;